Point-of-care testing in India: missed opportunities to realize the true potential of point-of-care testing programs
Authors
Nora Engel
Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Postbus 616, Maastricht, MD NL - 6200 The Netherlands
Gayatri Ganesh
Institute of Public Health, #250, 2nd C Main, 2nd C Cross, Girinagar I Phase, Bangalore, 560 085 India
Mamata Patil
Institute of Public Health, #250, 2nd C Main, 2nd C Cross, Girinagar I Phase, Bangalore, 560 085 India
Vijayashree Yellappa
Institute of Public Health, #250, 2nd C Main, 2nd C Cross, Girinagar I Phase, Bangalore, 560 085 India
Caroline Vadnais
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill International TB Centre, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2 Canada
Nitika Pai
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, V Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, H3A1A1 Canada
Madhukar Pai
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill International TB Centre, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2 Canada
Keywords:
Point-of-care, Testing, Diagnostics, India, Qualitative
Abstract
The core objective of any point-of-care (POC) testing program is to ensure that testing will result in an actionable management decision (e.g. referral, confirmatory test, treatment), within the same clinical encounter (e.g. POC continuum). This can but does not have to involve rapid tests. Most studies on POC testing focus on one specific test and disease in a particular healthcare setting. This paper describes the actors, technologies and practices involved in diagnosing major diseases in five Indian settings – the home, community, clinics, peripheral laboratories and hospitals. The aim was to understand how tests are used and fit into the health system and with what implications for the POC continuum.
Methods
The paper reports on a qualitative study including 78 semi-structured interviews and 13 focus group discussions with doctors, nurses, patients, lab technicians, program officers and informal providers, conducted between January and June 2013 in rural and urban Karnataka, South India. Actors, diseases, tests and diagnostic processes were mapped for each of the five settings and analyzed with regard to whether and how POC continuums are being ensured.
Results
Successful POC testing hardly occurs in any of the five settings. In hospitals and public clinics, most of the rapid tests are used in laboratories where either the single patient encounter advantage is not realized or the rapidity is compromised. Lab-based testing in a context of manpower and equipment shortages leads to delays. In smaller peripheral laboratories and private clinics with shorter turn-around-times, rapid tests are unavailable or too costly. Here providers find alternative measures to ensure the POC continuum. In the home setting, patients who can afford a test are not/do not feel empowered to use those devices.
Conclusion
These results show that there is much diagnostic delay that deters the POC continuum. Existing rapid tests are currently not translated into treatment decisions rapidly or are not available where they could ensure shorter turn-around times, thus undermining their full potential. To ensure the success of POC testing programs, test developers, decision-makers and funders need to account for such ground realities and overcome barriers to POC testing programs.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1223-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Point-of-care, Testing, Diagnostics, India, Qualitative
Click on "Archives" to access the full archive of scientific preprints. You may use the categories and the search functionality to find select preprints you're interested in.