Preprint / Version 1

Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Horse Gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) Genotypes for Horse Gram Yellow Mosaic Virus Resistance

Authors

  • Sudhagar Rajaprakasam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Priyanka Shanmugavel Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Vanniarajan Chockalingam Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Trichy 620027, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Souframanien Jegadeesan Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, Maharashtra, India
  • Tnpalayam Latha Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Saravanan Ananthan Sugarcane Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Melalathur, Vellore 635806, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Raveendran Muthurajan Directorate of Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Selvaraju Kanagarajan Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, 234 22 Lomma, Sweden

Keywords:

horse gram, metabolomics, resistance, yellow mosaic virus

Abstract

Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) is an under-utilized legume grown in India. It is a good source of protein, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, minerals, and vitamins. We screened 252 horse gram germplasm accessions for horse gram yellow mosaic virus resistance using the percent disease index and scaling techniques. The percentage values of highly resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible, and highly susceptible were 0.34, 13.89, 38.89, 46.43, and 0.34, respectively. Repetitive trials confirmed the host-plant resistance levels, and yield loss was assessed. The present disease index ranged from 1.2 to 72.0 and 1.2 to 73.0 during the kharif and rabi seasons of 2018, respectively. The maximum percent yield loss was noticed in the HS (75.0 –89.4), while HR possessed the minimum (1.2–2.0). The methanolic leaf extracts of highly resistant and highly susceptible genotypes with essential controls were subjected to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. Differential accumulation of metabolites was noticed, and a total of 81 metabolites representing 26 functional groups were identified. Both highly resistant and susceptible genotypes harbored eight unique classes, while ten biomolecules were common. The hierarchical cluster analysis indicated a distinct metabolite profile. Fold change in the common metabolites revealed an enhanced accumulation of sugars, alkanes, and carboxylic acids in the highly resistant genotype. The principal component analysis plots explained 93.7% of the variation. The metabolite profile showed a significant accumulation of three anti-viral (octadecanoic acid, diphenyl sulfone, and 2-Aminooxazole), one insecticidal (9,10-Secocholesta-5,7,10(19)-triene-3,24,25-triol), one antifeedant (cucurbitacin B), and six metabolites with unknown biological function in the highly resistant genotype. Keywords: horse gram, metabolomics, resistance, yellow mosaic virus

Author Biographies

Sudhagar Rajaprakasam, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India

Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Supervision

Priyanka Shanmugavel, Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India

Conceptualization, Investigation

Vanniarajan Chockalingam, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Trichy 620027, Tamil Nadu, India

Writing – review & editing, Supervision

Souframanien Jegadeesan, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, Maharashtra, India

Resources, Writing – review & editing

Tnpalayam Latha, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India

Methodology, Investigation

Saravanan Ananthan, Sugarcane Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Melalathur, Vellore 635806, Tamil Nadu, India

Resources

Raveendran Muthurajan, Directorate of Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India

Methodology, Supervision

Selvaraju Kanagarajan, Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, 234 22 Lomma, Sweden

Writing – review & editing, Supervision

Downloads